|
Body Mind Spirit - Water is more than
just H20
The Negative Health
Effects of Chlorine
Joseph G. Hattersley
The Journal of
Orthomolecular Medicine Vol. 15, 2nd Quarter 2000
http://www.orthomolecular.org/library/jom/2000/articles/2000-v15n02-p089.shtml
Introduction
Federal regulations
require chlorine treatment of the water supplied to urban and
suburban areas of America and much of Canada from surface sources
such as lakes, reservoirs and rivers, constituting about 75
percent of water consumed. Water from underground sources
generally is not chlorinated unless it is supplemented by surface
water. My hometown, Lacey, Washington, and some surrounding
communities that are supplied water by Lacey, are fortunate to be
among that group; I’d like to see that continue.
Chlorination is inferior
water treatment on at least two counts. (1) Although it has
greatly lowered infectious waterborne diseases in the U.S.A. and
Canada, chlorination fails against a variety of water problems
including parasites and can seriously harm people who use the
water. (2) Its cost is unnecessarily high. As of 1996, Andover,
Massachusetts’ new ozone treatment costs $83 per million gallons
of purified water, only two-thirds as much as the old treatment
process. The town saves $64,000 annually in chemicals costs alone,1
and uses less electricity.
Chemical Background
Highly reactive chlorine
is one of the industrial waste products profitably disposed of
using people as garbage cans,8 then on into the
environment. Chlorine oxidizes lipid contaminants in the water. It
thus creates free radicals,2 (highly reactive atomic or
sub-atomic particles lacking an electron) and oxysterols (formed
when lipid and oxygen molecules combine).9,10
To function we require
moderate numbers of both free radicals and oxysterols. The immune
system employs free radicals to kill cells that its cellular
immune mechanism can’t handle. A second mechanism using free
radicals initiates programmed cell suicide known as apoptosis.11
And moderate quantities of oxysterols, like cholesterol itself,
serve a protective function.12 But excess free radicals
and excess oxysterols damage arteries and initiate cancer, among
many other kinds of harm.
Chlorine in water
destroys protective acidophilus, which nourishes and coöperates
with the 3 to 3.5 pounds13 of immunity-strengthening
“friendly” organisms lining the colon, where about 60 percent of
our immune cells operate.14 And chlorine combines with
organic impurities in the water to make trihalomethanes (THMs), or
chloramines.
Among the THMs that
result from chlorine combining with organic compounds in water are
carcinogenic chloroform and carbon tetrachloride. It is the
combination of chlorine and organic materials already in the water
that produces cancer-causing byproducts. The more organic matter
in the water, the greater is the accumulation of THMs.20
In a study of more than
5,000 pregnant women in the Fontana, Walnut Creek and Santa Clara
areas of California, researchers from the state health department
found that women who drank more than five glasses a day of tap
water containing over 75 parts per billion (ppb) of THMs had a 9.5
percent risk of spontaneous abortion, i.e. miscarriage. Women less
exposed to the contaminants showed 5.7 percent risk; no comparison
was given for women who in-gested no THMs.21
Industrial chemist J.P.
Bercz, showed in 1992 that chlorinated water alters and destroys
unsaturated essential fatty acids (EFAs),15 the
building blocks of human brains and central nervous systems.16
The compound hypochlorite, created when chlorine mixes with water,
generates excess free radicals; these oxidize EFAs, turning them
rancid.
Most Western diets
already contain very little of critically needed omega-3 EFAs.
These are found in fish oil, flaxseed oil and also in moderate
quantity in extra-virgin olive oil. These EFAs, except in olive
oil, go rancid quickly. And so, to extend their products’ shelf
life food processors remove all health-promoting EFAs, as well as
destroying or discarding most needed micronutrients.
Processors substitute
either saturated fats or partially hydrogenated trans fats. Found
in all packaged foods that have long lists of hard-to-pronounce
chemical names on the side, trans fatty acids consumed in large
quantity can cause heart attacks and many other degenerative
diseases.17-19
Possible Artery Damage
When chlorinated water is
run through a hose or carried in a pail followed by milk as in a
dairy, “very tenacious, yellowish deposits chemically similar to
arterial plaque” form; with unchlorinated water this doesn’t
happen.2
CBS’ “Sixty Minutes” show
July 11, 1992, displayed two laboratory rats, both of them eating
standard rat chow and drinking chlorinated water. One rat was also
on pasteurized, homogenized milk. When the animals were
sacrificed, the arteries of the milk-drinking rats were found to
be clogged.
Dairy buckets, hoses and
rats’ arteries resist the arterial-wall damage known as
atherosclerosis. But what can chlorinated water and cow milk,
particularly homogenized milk, do to the far more susceptible
arteries of humans? Those of young chickens are about as
susceptible to such damage as human arteries. As a first
approximation, J.M. Price, MD, gave cockerels (roosters less than
a year old) only chlorinated water (without milk). They developed
arterial plaques; and the stronger the concentration of chlorine,
the faster and worse the damage. Cockerels on unchlorinated water
developed no such damage.2
The residents of the
small town of Roseto, Pennsylvania, had no heart attacks despite a
diet rich in saturated animal fats and milk–until they moved away
from Roseto’s mountain spring water and drank chlorinated water.
After that, consuming the same diet, they had heart attacks.2
The Roseto example is dramatic enough but the needed detailed
comparisons and follow-up have never been done.
How closely does the
incidence of heart attacks match the areas where, and times when
water is chlorinated? Chlorination spread throughout America in
the second and third decades of this century, about 20 years
before the increase of heart attacks. Light chlorination yielded
slow growth of plaques in Price’s cockerels, therefore,
chlorination of people’s drinking water at the usual low
concentration might have been expected to take at least 10-20
years to produce clinical manifestations of atherosclerosis.
A physician team led by
William F. Enos autopsied 300 GIs who had died in battle in the
Korean War. These men, who had passed induction examination as
healthy, averaged 22.1 years of age. To their shock and amazement,
in 77percent of the 300 the pathologists found “gross evidence of
arteriosclerosis in the coronary arteries.” In several, one or
more heart arteries were partly or completely occluded.3
Although Enos didn’t try to explain his grisly discovery, he
assumed arterial clogging had developed gradually. Seeming to
support that assumption, almost 20 years later pathologists
discovered early arterial damage in 96 percent of nearly 200
consecutive babies who had died from various causes in their first
month outside the womb. Two of those babies’ coronary arteries
were blocked, causing infantile heart attacks.4
Identified as crib deaths, these were related to functionally
deficient vitamin B6.5
But did arterial damage
in fact develop slowly? The water that the American soldiers had
to drink in Korea was so heavily chlorinated that many could
hardly tolerate it. In Vietnam, too, autopsies of American solders
found heart artery damage.6 Again, water supplied to
them had been heavily chlorinated.2 Did much of the
soldiers’ arterial damage develop not gradually but quickly as in
Dr. Price’s cockerels? The truth–slow or rapid development of
clogging–may never be known. Interestingly, from 1950 to 1965
while heart attacks increased, on a population level arterial
lesions did not increase;7 the major growth was in
clotting.
Relation to Melanoma
and Cancers
Studies in Belgium have
related devel-opment of deadly malignant melanoma to consumption
of chlorinated water.28 Drinking and swimming in
chlorinated water can cause melanoma.29,30,31 Sodium
hypochlorite, used in chlorination of water for swimming pools,
is mutagenic in the Ames test and other mutagenicity tests.32,33
Redheads and blonds are disproportionately melanoma-prone; their
skin contains a relative excess of pheomelanins34
compared to darker people.35 Franz Rampen of the
Netherlands reports worldwide pollution of rivers and oceans and
chlorination of swimming pool water have led to an increase in
melanoma.36,37
Long-term risks of
consuming chlorinated water include excessive free radical
formation, which accelerates aging, increases vulnerability to
genetic mutation and cancer development, hinders cholesterol
metabolism, and promotes hardening of arteries.
Excess free radicals
created by chlorinated water also generate dangerous toxins in
the body. These have been directly linked to liver malfunction,
weakening of the immune system and pre-arteriosclerotic changes
in arteries. Excessive free radicals have been linked also to
alterations of cellular DNA.42 Chlorine also destroys
antioxidant vitamin E,2 which is needed to counteract
excess oxysterols/free radicals for cardiac and anti-cancer
protection.
A study in the late
1970s found that chlorinated water appears to increase the risk
of gastrointestinal cancer over a person’s lifetime by 50 to 100
percent. This study analyzed thousands of cancer deaths in North
Carolina, Illinois, Wisconsin and Louisiana. Risk of such
cancers results from use of water containing chlorine at or
below the Environmental Protection Agency standard and “is going
to make the E.P.A. standard look ridiculous,” stated Robert
Harris, lead scientist in the study.43
A later meta-analysis44
found chlorinated water is associated each year in America with
about 4,200 cases of bladder cancer and 6,500 cases of rectal
cancer. Chlorine is estimated to account for nine percent of
bladder cancer cases and 18 percent of rectal cancers.45
Those cancers develop because the bladder and rectum store waste
products for periods of time. (Keeping the bowels moving
regularly lowers such risk.) Chlorinated water is associated,
too, with higher total risk of combined cancers.46
Further Risks of
Chlorinated Water
Chlorine in swimming
pools reacts with organic matter such as sweat, urine, blood,
feces, and mucus and skin cells to form more chloramines.
Chloroform risk can be 70 to 240 times higher in the air over
indoor pools than over outdoor pools.22 Canadian
researchers found that after an hour of swimming in a
chlorinated pool, chloroform concentrations in the swi-mers’
blood ranged from 100 to 1,093 ppb.23 If the pool
smells very much of chlorine, don’t go near it.
Taking a warm shower or
lounging in a tub filled with hot chlorinated water, one inhales
chloroform. Researchers recorded increases in chloroform
concentration in bathers’ lungs of about 2.7 ppb after a
10-minute shower. Worse, warm water causes the skin to act like
a sponge; and so one will absorb and inhale more chlorine in a
ten-minute shower than by drinking eight glasses of the same
water. This irritates the eyes, the sinuses, throat, skin and
lungs, dries the hair and scalp, worsening dandruff. It can also
weaken immunity.
A window from the
shower room open to the outdoors would release chloroform from
the shower room air, but to prevent its absorption through the
skin requires a showerhead that removes chlorine.
Dishwashers pollute
indoor air with chlorinated organics created from dishwasher
detergents and volatilized in the air for us to breathe. They
vent five to seven liters of air into the house air every minute
of operation. The chlorine reacts with food scraps.24
Ceramic disks, used instead of detergents, totally avoid the
problem and are said to be about 75% less costly than detergent.25,26,27
Chlorine in treated
water can also cause allergic symptoms ranging from skin rash to
intestinal symptoms to arthritis, and headaches.47
Recent research has
found a new hazard in chlorinated water: a byproduct called MX.
A research team from the National Public Health Institute in
Finland discov-ered that, by causing genetic mutations, MX
initiates cancer in laboratory ani-mals.48,49 Also,
DCA (dichloroacedic acid) in chlorinated water alters
cholesterol me-tabolism, changing HDL to LDL choles-terol50–and
causes liver cancer in labora-tory animals.51
Plants do not thrive as
well on chlo-rinated as on unchlorinated water; wild animals do
not develop atherosclerosis until they drink chlorinated water
in American zoos. Although their food, se-lected by people,
isn't the same as what they caught, plucked or dug up in the
wilds, evidence indicates chlorinated water, with its thousands
of other chemicals, is the worst culprit in zoo animals’
arterial clog-ging.
Substitute Water
Treatments
Hydrogen peroxide
(H2O2) destroys infectious organisms and impurities in water
4,000 times better than chlorine.56 “A 35-percent
technical grade H2O2 will pro-mote bacterial growth to break
down sewage and enhance the dissolved oxygen level in discharge
water entering lakes and streams.”57 Ozone (O3)
treatment is equally effective. Worldwide, 1,100 cities treat
their drinking water with ozone; many have done so since as
early as 1901.58 Los Angeles treats its drinking
water with H2O2, and then adds chlorine.59 Some
chlorine may likewise be added after ozonation to prevent
re-infestation; about one-third as much suffices.
To generate ozone, dry
air or oxygen is passed through a high-voltage electrical field.
Ozone drinking-water treatment in Andover, Massachusetts
successfully con-trolled the effects of algae blooms and
eliminated water quality problems. Potential THM formation was
reduced by an average of 75 percent.60
H2O2 and O3 are
relatively inexpensive; moreover, the only byproducts are pure
oxygen and hydrogen, so no one can reap a big immediate profit
on their disposal. (Hydrogen is a potential major energy source
for electricity generation and for zero-emission vehicles.61)
France and Germany, wiser and less controlled by the chemical
indus-try, now chlorinate water only in emergencies.62
Other Water Pollution
Problems
EPA tests have shown
that in the water we drink, over 2,100 organic and inorganic
chemicals including pesticides, heavy metals, radon,63
radioactive particles64 and parasitic organisms65
including cryptosporidium66,67 have been identified;
156 of them are pure carcinogens. (In 1993, cryptosporidium
killed more than 100 and infected over 400,000.) Of those, 26
are tumor promoting: they can make an existing tumor grow.
Exposure to cryptosporidium in people with lowered
gastrointestinal immune function could lead to chronic GI
infection.68 Other examples include recurring cases
of Legionnaire’s disease, a pneumonia caused by Legionella
pneumophila, which may lurk in hot water supplies.69
A public notice
recently issued in Washington, D.C. warned that a high level of
bacteria in the (chlorinated, fluoridated city system) water
made it unsafe for dialysis patients, AIDS patients, organ
transplant patients, the elderly and infants. Water
contamination is often worst in small communities that can't
afford proper treatment; the EPA has not released this
information.70
Testimony to hearings
of the House Committee on Government Reform and Oversight
revealed Pfiesteria outbreaks among people drinking chlorinated
water. The organism, which kills fish, sickens some people; they
get sick from drinking the water, not from eating infected
seafood. The EPA’s Robert Perciasepe said, in written testimony,
“Any new public health policy on this issue needs to consider
reduction of nitrogen and phosphorus pollution in our waters.”71,72
A bill passed by the U.S. House of Representatives would require
managers of municipal water systems to tell customers what
contaminants have been found in local drinking water.73
But government laboratories test only for bacterial content and
a few of the major inorganic toxins such as lead and arsenic.
So, for a complete water test one must consult a private
laboratory.
The EPA called 129
contaminants found in water supplies "dangerous" singly, let
alone in combination. Pesticides and other toxic wastes run off
farmlands and pastures or are dumped by factories, pollute
rivers and seep into underground aquifers. Aptly called
"biocides" by Russell Jaffe, MD, PhD, pesticides are designed to
end life; few have been shown to be safe. The EPA depends on
producers of pesticides to test their safety: the wolf guards
the hen house. It should be no surprise that the tests take a
long time and many have been fraudulent.
The Negative Health
Effects of Chlorine
Further, one poison is
tested at a time; synergistic effects of combinations,
potentially far worse, are ignored.78 Besides, many
of the so-called "inert" substances in pesticide combinations
are more toxic than the "active;" one of the “inerts” is DDT,
supposedly prohibited for American farm use since 1973.79
The American Society of
Microbiology reported that water in the U.S.A. is filled with
microbes, such as viruses and bacteria, which pose a growing
threat to public health. The document states that water
pollution control efforts have focused on protecting water
against chemical pollution, but they neglect serious problems
from wastewater, sewer overflows, septic tanks, and the risks
associated with microbial pollutants. The report recommended
creation of a task force to coordinate federal agency activities
on environmental and public health issues.80 Isn’t
all that bad enough without the deliberate addition of the
further toxicity of chlorine?
References
- City improves water
quality with ozone system (Andover, Massachusetts). Amer
City & County, 1996; 111; 12: 38.
- Price JM:
Coronaries/Cholesterol/Chlorine, NY: Pyramid, 1969.
- Enos WF, et al:
Coronary disease among United States soldiers killed in action
in Korea. JAMA, 1953; 152: 1090-1093.
- Jaffe D, et al:
Coronary arteries in newborn children: Intimal variations in
longitudinal sections and their relationships to clinical
and experimental data. Acta Paediat Scand Supp.
- 219: 1-27.
- Suzman MM:
Nutritional and metabolic factors in the development of
coronary artery disease in early life: The possible role of
dietary protein and pyridoxine. Unpub. Abstr., 1984.
- McNamara, JJ et al:
Coronary artery disease in combat casualties in Vietnam.
JAMA, 1971; 216: 1185-1187.
- Nieper H: Mineral
transporters, New Dynamics of Preventive Medicine,
1974.
- Others are mercury
in dental amalgams, fluoride and other chemical wastes
disposed of into the atmosphere and into drinking water.
- Janney P: Health
dowsing in the 1990s (audio Journal of Orthomolecular
Medicine Vol. 15, No. 2, 2000 tape), Sylvia, NC: Goodkind of
Sound, 1992.
10.Taylor CB et al:
Spontaneously occurring angiotoxic derivatives of cholesterol.
Am J Clin Nutr, 1979;32:40-57. 11.Taylor EW: Interview on
Bland JS, Funct Med Update, 1997; May. 12. Smith LL:
Another cholesterol hypothesis: Cholesterol as antioxidant.
Free Rad Biol Med, 1991;
11: 47-61.
- Bland JS: Funct
Med Update, 1999.
- Dash SK: Lecture
to National Health Federation, 1993.
- Bercz JP: Toxicology
of drinking water disinfection byproducts from nutrients. Rate
studies of destruction of polyunsaturated fatty acids in vitro
by chlorine-based disinfectants. Chem Res Toxicol,
1992; 5: 418-425.
- Howell E: Enzyme
Nutrition: The Food Enzyme Concept. Wayne, NJ: Avery Publ
Group, 1985.
- Bercz JP: Op. Cit.
- Budwig J: Flax
Oil as A True Aid Against Arthritis, Heart Infarction, Cancer
and Other Diseases. Vancouver, BC: Apple Publ., 1993.
- Rogers SA: Tired or
Toxic? Syracuse, NY: Pres-tige Publ., 1990.
- Waller K et al:
Trihalomethanes in drinking water and spontaneous abortion.
Epidemiol, 1998; 9; 2: 134-140.
- Herwart BL et al.
Outbreaks of waterborne disease in the U.S.: 1989-190.
JAWWA, 1992Apr:29.
- J Exposure
Analysis and Environ Epidemiol, 1994; 4;4: 491-502.
- Levesque B: in
Environmental Health Perspectives 1994;Dec. Sci News,
1995;147:5.
- Sci News,
1999;July 10;156:22.
- Craun G: Surface
water supplies and health JAWWA, 1988; Feb:40.
- Mercola J: Health
news you can use. July 1999:6.
www.mercola.com
- Herbert HJ:
Bacterial threat to water supply reported growing. Orange
County Register, 1996; July 11.
- Douglass WC:
Second Opinion, 1994;Feb.
- Prota G: Recent
advances in the chemistry of melanogenesis in mammals. J
Invest Dermatol, 1980; 75: 122-127.
- Rampen FH, Nelewans
RT, Kerbeek ALM: Is water pollution a cause of cutaneous
melanoma? Epidemiol, 1992;3;3:263-265.
- Murray F:The
Murray report. Let’s Live 1997;Oct:16.
- Meier JR: Genotoxic
activity of organic chemicals in drinking water. Mutat Res,
1988; 196; 211-245
- Kurakawa Y, Takayama
S et al: Long-term in vivo carcinogenicity tests of potassium
bromate, sodium
hypochlorite, and sodium chlorite conducted in Japan. Environ
Cellular Perspect, 1996; 69: 221-25.
- The prefix pheo-
means dusky, gray, or dun.
- Cesarini JR:
Photo-induced events in the human melanocytic system:
Photoagression and photoprotection. Pigment Cell Res,1988;1:223-233.
- Rampen FH et al:
Epidemiology, 1992;3;3:263-265.
37.Murray F: The Murray
report. Let’s Live, 1997; Oct: 16.
- Beral V et al:
Malignant melanoma and exposure to fluorescent lighting at
work. Lancet, 1982; Aug 7: 290-293.
- Kustov VI et al:
Epidemiology of malignant melanoma. Vopr Onkol, 1987;
33: 35-39 [Engl abstract).
- Ott JN: Light,
Radiation and You. Greenwich, CT: Devin-Adair Publishers,
1990.
41 Garland FC et al:
Occupational sunlight exposure and melanoma in the U.S. Navy.
Arch Environ Health, 1990;45:261-267.
- Bercz JP: Op. cit.
- Harris R: Speech to
Miami chapter of Sierra Club, 1980. NY Times, 1980;Oct
17.
- A study of many
epidemiological–statistical population–surveys, some of whose
results conflicted.
- Am J Public
Health 1997;87:1168-1176.
- Morris RD et al:
Chlorination, chlorination byproducts and cancer: A
meta-analysis. Amer J Pub Health, 1992; 82: 955-963.
47.Douglass WC:
Letters. Second Opinion, 1998;June:8.
- J Natl Canc Inst,
1997; 89: 832-833, 848-856.
- Whitaker JM:
Health and Healing, 1997;Aug (Suppl.)
- Douglass WC:
Second Opinion, 1994;Dec.
- What Doctors
Don’t Tell You, 1997; Oct; special supplement.
- Williams DG:
Alternatives for the Health Conscious Individual. 1997;
August.
- Bland JS: Prev
Med Update, 1994;Nov.
- Williams DG:
Alternatives for the Health Conscious Individual. 1997;
August.
- Hattersley JG: The
case against fluoridation. J Orthomol Med, 1999; 14:
185-197.
- McCabe E: Oxygen
Therapies. Morrisville, NY: Energy Publications, 1990.
57.Walters C: The
last word. Acres USA 1999; Aug: 46.
- McCabe E: Op. cit.
- Los Angeles Dept
of Water and Power, 1992.
- Ann Hatcher, senior
analyst with the NEES Companies, Westborough, Mass. Amer
City & County, 1996; 111; 12: 38.
- The third age of
fuel. The Economist, 1997:Oct
25: 16. The Negative
Health Effects of Chlorine
- Hans Raible:
Stuttgart, Germany. Personal communication, 1993.
- See Addendum.
- Null GH et al: What
physicians should know about the biological effects of
ingested fission products. Townsend Ltr Doc, 1993;
Aug:812-815.
- Bland JS: Prev
Med Update, 1993;Mar.
- McAnulty JM et al: A
community-wide outbreak of cryptosporidiosis associated with
swimming at a wave pool. JAMA, 1994; 272: 1597-1600.
67.Rose JB:
Environmental ecology of crypto-sporidium and public health
implications. Annu Rev Public Health, 1997; 18: 135-161.
- Bland JS: Funct
Med Update, 1997;Oct.
- Whitaker JM: Don’t
drink tap water. Health &
Healing, 1998; Apr:4-7. 70.Glum
GL: Essiac: Nature’s cure for cancer. Wild-
fire, 1991; 6: 48-55.
71.Mlot C: Feds tackle toxic cell.
Sci News, 1997;152:213.
72.Excess phosphorus–also put into soft
drinks to prevent their acidity from dissolving the teeth–
drains calcium out of the skeleton promoting osteoporosis and
hip fractures.
73.Amer City & County,
1996;111;12:38.
74.Rogers SA: Northeast Center for
Environmental Medicine Health Letter, 1994; Summer.
75. Janney P: Op.
cit.76.Willix.77.Treacy K: Personal communication,
1994.78.Rogers SA: Tired or Toxic?79.Rogers SA: Depression:
Cured at Last! Sarasota,
FL: SK Publ, 1996. 80.Bugs in our
water. Acres USA, 1999;Sept:5.
|