|
The Forged Origins of
The New Testament
In the fourth century, the Roman Emperor Constantine united all
religious factions under one composite deity, and ordered the
compilation of new and old writings into a uniform collection that
became the New Testament.
Extracted from Nexus
Magazine, Volume 14, Number 4 (June - July 2007)
PO Box 30, Mapleton Qld 4560 Australia.
editor@nexusmagazine.com
Telephone: +61 (0)7 5442 9280; Fax: +61 (0)7 5442 9381
From our web page at:
www.nexusmagazine.com
http://www.nexusmagazine.com/articles/NewTestament.html
by Tony Bushby © March 2007
Correspondence:
c/- NEXUS Magazine PO Box 30,
Mapleton, Qld 4560, Australia
Fax: +61 (0)7 5493 1900
What the Church doesn't
want you to know
It has often been emphasised that
Christianity is unlike any other religion, for it stands or falls by
certain events which are alleged to have occurred during a short
period of time some 20 centuries ago. Those stories are presented in
the New Testament, and as new evidence is revealed it will become
clear that they do not represent historical realities. The Church
agrees, saying: "Our documentary sources of knowledge about the
origins of Christianity and its earliest development are chiefly the
New Testament Scriptures, the authenticity of which we must, to a
great extent, take for granted."
(Catholic Encyclopedia,
Farley ed., vol. iii, p. 712)
The Church makes
extraordinary admissions about its New Testament. For example, when
discussing the origin of those writings, "the most distinguished
body of academic opinion ever assembled" (Catholic Encyclopedias,
Preface) admits that the Gospels "do not go back to the first
century of the Christian era" (Catholic Encyclopedia, Farley ed.,
vol. vi, p. 137, pp. 655-6). This statement conflicts with
priesthood assertions that the earliest Gospels were progressively
written during the decades following the death of the Gospel Jesus
Christ. In a remarkable aside, the Church further admits that "the
earliest of the extant manuscripts [of the New Testament], it is
true, do not date back beyond the middle of the fourth century AD"
(Catholic Encyclopedia, op. cit., pp. 656-7). That is some 350 years
after the time the Church claims that a Jesus Christ walked the
sands of Palestine, and here the true story of Christian origins
slips into one of the biggest black holes in history. There is,
however, a reason why there were no New Testaments until the fourth
century: they were not written until then, and here we find evidence
of the greatest misrepresentation of all time.
It was British-born Flavius
Constantinus (Constantine, originally Custennyn or Custennin)
(272-337) who authorised the compilation of the writings now called
the New Testament. After the death of his father in 306, Constantine
became King of Britain, Gaul and Spain, and then, after a series of
victorious battles, Emperor of the Roman Empire. Christian
historians give little or no hint of the turmoil of the times and
suspend Constantine in the air, free of all human events happening
around him. In truth, one of Constantine's main problems was the
uncontrollable disorder amongst presbyters and their belief in
numerous gods. The majority of modern-day Christian writers suppress
the truth about the development of their religion and conceal
Constantine's efforts to curb the disreputable character of the
presbyters who are now called "Church Fathers" (Catholic
Encyclopedia, Farley ed., vol. xiv, pp. 370-1). They were
"maddened", he said (Life of Constantine, attributed to Eusebius
Pamphilius of Caesarea, c. 335, vol. iii, p. 171; The Nicene and
Post-Nicene Fathers, cited as N&PNF, attributed to St Ambrose, Rev.
Prof. Roberts, DD, and Principal James Donaldson, LLD, editors,
1891, vol. iv, p. 467). The "peculiar type of oratory" expounded by
them was a challenge to a settled religious order (The Dictionary of
Classical Mythology, Religion, Literature and Art, Oskar Seyffert,
Gramercy, New York, 1995, pp. 544-5). Ancient records reveal the
true nature of the presbyters, and the low regard in which they were
held has been subtly suppressed by modern Church historians. In
reality, they were: "...the most rustic fellows, teaching strange
paradoxes. They openly declared that none but the ignorant was fit
to hear their discourses ... they never appeared in the circles of
the wiser and better sort, but always took care to intrude
themselves among the ignorant and uncultured, rambling around to
play tricks at fairs and markets ... they lard their lean books with
the fat of old fables ... and still the less do they understand ...
and they write nonsense on vellum ... and still be doing, never
done."
(Contra Celsum ["Against
Celsus"], Origen of Alexandria, c. 251, Bk I, p. lxvii, Bk III, p.
xliv, passim)
Clusters of presbyters had
developed "many gods and many lords" (1 Cor. 8:5) and numerous
religious sects existed, each with differing doctrines (Gal. 1:6).
Presbyterial groups clashed over attributes of their various gods
and "altar was set against altar" in competing for an audience (Optatus
of Milevis, 1:15, 19, early fourth century). From Constantine's
point of view, there were several factions that needed satisfying,
and he set out to develop an all-embracing religion during a period
of irreverent confusion. In an age of crass ignorance, with
nine-tenths of the peoples of Europe illiterate, stabilising
religious splinter groups was only one of Constantine's problems.
The smooth generalisation, which so many historians are content to
repeat, that Constantine "embraced the Christian religion" and
subsequently granted "official toleration", is "contrary to
historical fact" and should be erased from our literature forever
(Catholic Encyclopedia, Pecci ed., vol. iii, p. 299, passim). Simply
put, there was no Christian religion at Constantine's time, and the
Church acknowledges that the tale of his "conversion" and "baptism"
are "entirely legendary" (Catholic Encyclopedia, Farley ed., vol.
xiv, pp. 370-1). Constantine "never acquired a solid theological
knowledge" and "depended heavily on his advisers in religious
questions" (Catholic Encyclopedia, New Edition, vol. xii, p. 576,
passim). According to Eusebeius (260-339), Constantine noted that
among the presbyterian factions "strife had grown so serious,
vigorous action was necessary to establish a more religious state",
but he could not bring about a settlement between rival god factions
(Life of Constantine, op. cit., pp. 26-8). His advisers warned him
that the presbyters' religions were "destitute of foundation" and
needed official stabilisation (ibid.). Constantine saw in this
confused system of fragmented dogmas the opportunity to create a new
and combined State religion, neutral in concept, and to protect it
by law. When he conquered the East in 324 he sent his Spanish
religious adviser, Osius of Córdoba, to Alexandria with letters to
several bishops exhorting them to make peace among themselves. The
mission failed and Constantine, probably at the suggestion of Osius,
then issued a decree commanding all presbyters and their
subordinates "be mounted on asses, mules and horses belonging to the
public, and travel to the city of Nicaea" in the Roman province of
Bithynia in Asia Minor. They were instructed to bring with them the
testimonies they orated to the rabble, "bound in leather" for
protection during the long journey, and surrender them to
Constantine upon arrival in Nicaea (The Catholic Dictionary, Addis
and Arnold, 1917, "Council of Nicaea" entry). Their writings
totalled "in all, two thousand two hundred and thirty-one scrolls
and legendary tales of gods and saviours, together with a record of
the doctrines orated by them" (Life of Constantine, op. cit., vol.
ii, p. 73; N&PNF, op. cit., vol. i, p. 518).
The First Council of
Nicaea and the "missing records"
Thus, the first ecclesiastical
gathering in history was summoned and is today known as the Council
of Nicaea. It was a bizarre event that provided many details of
early clerical thinking and presents a clear picture of the
intellectual climate prevailing at the time. It was at this
gathering that Christianity was born, and the ramifications of
decisions made at the time are difficult to calculate. About four
years prior to chairing the Council, Constantine had been initiated
into the religious order of Sol Invictus, one of the two thriving
cults that regarded the Sun as the one and only Supreme God (the
other was Mithraism). Because of his Sun worship, he instructed
Eusebius to convene the first of three sittings on the summer
solstice, 21 June 325 (Catholic Encyclopedia, New Edition, vol. i,
p. 792), and it was "held in a hall in Osius's palace"
(Ecclesiastical History, Bishop Louis Dupin, Paris, 1686, vol. i, p.
598). In an account of the proceedings of the conclave of presbyters
gathered at Nicaea, Sabinius, Bishop of Hereclea, who was in
attendance, said, "Excepting Constantine himself and Eusebius
Pamphilius, they were a set of illiterate, simple creatures who
understood nothing" (Secrets of the Christian Fathers, Bishop J. W.
Sergerus, 1685, 1897 reprint). This is another luminous confession
of the ignorance and uncritical credulity of early churchmen. Dr
Richard Watson (1737-1816), a disillusioned Christian historian and
one-time Bishop of Llandaff in Wales (1782), referred to them as "a
set of gibbering idiots" (An Apology for Christianity, 1776, 1796
reprint; also, Theological Tracts, Dr Richard Watson, "On Councils"
entry, vol. 2, London, 1786, revised reprint 1791). From his
extensive research into Church councils, Dr Watson concluded that
"the clergy at the Council of Nicaea were all under the power of the
devil, and the convention was composed of the lowest rabble and
patronised the vilest abominations" (An Apology for Christianity,
op. cit.). It was that infantile body of men who were responsible
for the commencement of a new religion and the theological creation
of Jesus Christ. The Church admits that vital elements of the
proceedings at Nicaea are "strangely absent from the canons"
(Catholic Encyclopedia, Farley ed., vol. iii, p. 160). We shall see
shortly what happened to them. However, according to records that
endured, Eusebius "occupied the first seat on the right of the
emperor and delivered the inaugural address on the emperor's behalf"
(Catholic Encyclopedia, Farley ed., vol. v, pp. 619-620). There were
no British presbyters at the council but many Greek delegates.
"Seventy Eastern bishops" represented Asiatic factions, and small
numbers came from other areas (Ecclesiastical History, ibid.).
Caecilian of Carthage travelled from Africa, Paphnutius of Thebes
from Egypt, Nicasius of Die (Dijon) from Gaul, and Donnus of Stridon
made the journey from Pannonia.
It was at that puerile
assembly, and with so many cults represented, that a total of 318
"bishops, priests, deacons, subdeacons, acolytes and exorcists"
gathered to debate and decide upon a unified belief system that
encompassed only one god (An Apology for Christianity, op. cit.). By
this time, a huge assortment of "wild texts" (Catholic Encyclopedia,
New Edition, "Gospel and Gospels") circulated amongst presbyters and
they supported a great variety of Eastern and Western gods and
goddesses: Jove, Jupiter, Salenus, Baal, Thor, Gade, Apollo, Juno,
Aries, Taurus, Minerva, Rhets, Mithra, Theo, Fragapatti, Atys, Durga,
Indra, Neptune, Vulcan, Kriste, Agni, Croesus, Pelides, Huit,
Hermes, Thulis, Thammus, Eguptus, Iao, Aph, Saturn, Gitchens, Minos,
Maximo, Hecla and Phernes (God's Book of Eskra, anon., ch. xlviii,
paragraph 36). Up until the First Council of Nicaea, the Roman
aristocracy primarily worshipped two Greek gods-Apollo and Zeus-but
the great bulk of common people idolised either Julius Caesar or
Mithras (the Romanised version of the Persian deity Mithra). Caesar
was deified by the Roman Senate after his death (15 March 44 BC) and
subsequently venerated as "the Divine Julius". The word "Saviour"
was affixed to his name, its literal meaning being "one who sows the
seed", i.e., he was a phallic god. Julius Caesar was hailed as "God
made manifest and universal Saviour of human life", and his
successor Augustus was called the "ancestral God and Saviour of the
whole human race" (Man and his Gods, Homer Smith, Little, Brown &
Co., Boston, 1952). Emperor Nero (54-68), whose original name was
Lucius Domitius Ahenobarbus (37-68), was immortalised on his coins
as the "Saviour of mankind" (ibid.). The Divine Julius as Roman
Saviour and "Father of the Empire" was considered "God" among the
Roman rabble for more than 300 years. He was the deity in some
Western presbyters' texts, but was not recognised in Eastern or
Oriental writings.
Constantine's intention at
Nicaea was to create an entirely new god for his empire who would
unite all religious factions under one deity. Presbyters were asked
to debate and decide who their new god would be. Delegates argued
among themselves, expressing personal motives for inclusion of
particular writings that promoted the finer traits of their own
special deity. Throughout the meeting, howling factions were
immersed in heated debates, and the names of 53 gods were tabled for
discussion. "As yet, no God had been selected by the council, and so
they balloted in order to determine that matter... For one year and
five months the balloting lasted..." (God's Book of Eskra, Prof. S.
L. MacGuire's translation, Salisbury, 1922, chapter xlviii,
paragraphs 36, 41). At the end of that time, Constantine returned to
the gathering to discover that the presbyters had not agreed on a
new deity but had balloted down to a shortlist of five prospects:
Caesar, Krishna, Mithra, Horus and Zeus (Historia Ecclesiastica,
Eusebius, c. 325). Constantine was the ruling spirit at Nicaea and
he ultimately decided upon a new god for them. To involve British
factions, he ruled that the name of the great Druid god, Hesus, be
joined with the Eastern Saviour-god, Krishna (Krishna is Sanskrit
for Christ), and thus Hesus Krishna would be the official name of
the new Roman god. A vote was taken and it was with a majority show
of hands (161 votes to 157) that both divinities became one God.
Following longstanding heathen custom, Constantine used the official
gathering and the Roman apotheosis decree to legally deify two
deities as one, and did so by democratic consent. A new god was
proclaimed and "officially" ratified by Constantine (Acta Concilii
Nicaeni, 1618). That purely political act of deification effectively
and legally placed Hesus and Krishna among the Roman gods as one
individual composite. That abstraction lent Earthly existence to
amalgamated doctrines for the Empire's new religion; and because
there was no letter "J" in alphabets until around the ninth century,
the name subsequently evolved into "Jesus Christ".
How the Gospels were
created
Constantine then instructed Eusebius
to organise the compilation of a uniform collection of new writings
developed from primary aspects of the religious texts submitted at
the council. His instructions were: "Search ye these books, and
whatever is good in them, that retain; but whatsoever is evil, that
cast away. What is good in one book, unite ye with that which is
good in another book. And whatsoever is thus brought together shall
be called The Book of Books. And it shall be the doctrine of my
people, which I will recommend unto all nations, that there shall be
no more war for religions' sake."
(God's Book of Eskra, op.
cit., chapter xlviii, paragraph 31)
"Make them to astonish" said
Constantine, and "the books were written accordingly" (Life of
Constantine, vol. iv, pp. 36-39). Eusebius amalgamated the
"legendary tales of all the religious doctrines of the world
together as one", using the standard god-myths from the presbyters'
manuscripts as his exemplars. Merging the supernatural "god" stories
of Mithra and Krishna with British Culdean beliefs effectively
joined the orations of Eastern and Western presbyters together "to
form a new universal belief" (ibid.). Constantine believed that the
amalgamated collection of myths would unite variant and opposing
religious factions under one representative story. Eusebius then
arranged for scribes to produce "fifty sumptuous copies ... to be
written on parchment in a legible manner, and in a convenient
portable form, by professional scribes thoroughly accomplished in
their art" (ibid.). "These orders," said Eusebius, "were followed by
the immediate execution of the work itself ... we sent him
[Constantine] magnificently and elaborately bound volumes of
three-fold and four-fold forms" (Life of Constantine, vol. iv, p.
36). They were the "New Testimonies", and this is the first mention
(c. 331) of the New Testament in the historical record. With his
instructions fulfilled, Constantine then decreed that the New
Testimonies would thereafter be called the "word of the Roman
Saviour God" (Life of Constantine, vol. iii, p. 29) and official to
all presbyters sermonising in the Roman Empire. He then ordered
earlier presbyterial manuscripts and the records of the council
"burnt" and declared that "any man found concealing writings should
be stricken off from his shoulders" (beheaded) (ibid.). As the
record shows, presbyterial writings previous to the Council of
Nicaea no longer exist, except for some fragments that have
survived. Some council records also survived, and they provide
alarming ramifications for the Church.Some old documents say that
the First Council of Nicaea ended in mid-November 326, while others
say the struggle to establish a god was so fierce that it extended
"for four years and seven months" from its beginning in June 325
(Secrets of the Christian Fathers, op. cit.). Regardless of when it
ended, the savagery and violence it encompassed were concealed under
the glossy title "Great and Holy Synod", assigned to the assembly by
the Church in the 18th century. Earlier Churchmen, however,
expressed a different opinion.
The Second Council of Nicaea
in 786-87 denounced the First Council of Nicaea as "a synod of fools
and madmen" and sought to annul "decisions passed by men with
troubled brains" (History of the Christian Church, H. H. Milman, DD,
1871). If one chooses to read the records of the Second Nicaean
Council and notes references to "affrighted bishops" and the
"soldiery" needed to "quell proceedings", the "fools and madmen"
declaration is surely an example of the pot calling the kettle
black. Constantine died in 337 and his outgrowth of many now-called
pagan beliefs into a new religious system brought many converts.
Later Church writers made him "the great champion of Christianity"
which he gave "legal status as the religion of the Roman Empire" (Encyclopedia
of the Roman Empire, Matthew Bunson, Facts on File, New York, 1994,
p. 86). Historical records reveal this to be incorrect, for it was
"self-interest" that led him to create Christianity (A Smaller
Classical Dictionary, J. M. Dent, London, 1910, p. 161). Yet it
wasn't called "Christianity" until the 15th century (How The Great
Pan Died, Professor Edmond S. Bordeaux [Vatican archivist], Mille
Meditations, USA, MCMLXVIII, pp. 45-7). Over the ensuing centuries,
Constantine's New Testimonies were expanded upon, "interpolations"
were added and other writings included (Catholic Encyclopedia,
Farley ed., vol. vi, pp. 135-137; also, Pecci ed., vol. ii, pp.
121-122). For example, in 397 John "golden-mouthed" Chrysostom
restructured the writings of Apollonius of Tyana, a first-century
wandering sage, and made them part of the New Testimonies (Secrets
of the Christian Fathers, op. cit.). The Latinised name for
Apollonius is Paulus (A Latin-English Dictionary, J. T. White and J.
E. Riddle, Ginn & Heath, Boston, 1880), and the Church today calls
those writings the Epistles of Paul. Apollonius's personal
attendant, Damis, an Assyrian scribe, is Demis in the New Testament
(2 Tim. 4:10).
The Church hierarchy knows
the truth about the origin of its Epistles, for Cardinal Bembo (d.
1547), secretary to Pope Leo X (d. 1521), advised his associate,
Cardinal Sadoleto, to disregard them, saying "put away these
trifles, for such absurdities do not become a man of dignity; they
were introduced on the scene later by a sly voice from heaven"
(Cardinal Bembo: His Letters and Comments on Pope Leo X, A. L.
Collins, London, 1842 reprint). The Church admits that the Epistles
of Paul are forgeries, saying, "Even the genuine Epistles were
greatly interpolated to lend weight to the personal views of their
authors" (Catholic Encyclopedia, Farley ed., vol. vii, p. 645).
Likewise, St Jerome (d. 420) declared that the Acts of the Apostles,
the fifth book of the New Testament, was also "falsely written"
("The Letters of Jerome", Library of the Fathers, Oxford Movement,
1833-45, vol. v, p. 445).
The shock discovery of an
ancient Bible
The New Testament subsequently evolved
into a fulsome piece of priesthood propaganda, and the Church
claimed it recorded the intervention of a divine Jesus Christ into
Earthly affairs. However, a spectacular discovery in a remote
Egyptian monastery revealed to the world the extent of later
falsifications of the Christian texts, themselves only an
"assemblage of legendary tales" (Encyclopédie, Diderot, 1759). On 4
February 1859, 346 leaves of an ancient codex were discovered in the
furnace room at St Catherine's monastery at Mt Sinai, and its
contents sent shockwaves through the Christian world. Along with
other old codices, it was scheduled to be burned in the kilns to
provide winter warmth for the inhabitants of the monastery. Written
in Greek on donkey skins, it carried both the Old and New
Testaments, and later in time archaeologists dated its composition
to around the year 380. It was discovered by Dr Constantin von
Tischendorf (1815-1874), a brilliant and pious German biblical
scholar, and he called it the Sinaiticus, the Sinai Bible.
Tischendorf was a professor of theology who devoted his entire life
to the study of New Testament origins, and his desire to read all
the ancient Christian texts led him on the long, camel-mounted
journey to St Catherine's Monastery. During his lifetime,
Tischendorf had access to other ancient Bibles unavailable to the
public, such as the Alexandrian (or Alexandrinus) Bible, believed to
be the second oldest Bible in the world. It was so named because in
1627 it was taken from Alexandria to Britain and gifted to King
Charles I (1600-49). Today it is displayed alongside the world's
oldest known Bible, the Sinaiticus, in the British Library in
London. During his research, Tischendorf had access to the Vaticanus,
the Vatican Bible, believed to be the third oldest in the world and
dated to the mid-sixth century (The Various Versions of the Bible,
Dr Constantin von Tischendorf, 1874, available in the British
Library). It was locked away in the Vatican's inner library.
Tischendorf asked if he could extract handwritten notes, but his
request was declined. However, when his guard took refreshment
breaks, Tischendorf wrote comparative narratives on the palm of his
hand and sometimes on his fingernails ("Are Our Gospels Genuine or
Not?", Dr Constantin von Tischendorf, lecture, 1869, available in
the British Library).
Today, there are several
other Bibles written in various languages during the fifth and sixth
centuries, examples being the Syriacus, the Cantabrigiensis (Bezae),
the Sarravianus and the Marchalianus. A shudder of apprehension
echoed through Christendom in the last quarter of the 19th century
when English-language versions of the Sinai Bible were published.
Recorded within these pages is information that disputes
Christianity's claim of historicity. Christians were provided with
irrefutable evidence of wilful falsifications in all modern New
Testaments. So different was the Sinai Bible's New Testament from
versions then being published that the Church angrily tried to annul
the dramatic new evidence that challenged its very existence. In a
series of articles published in the London Quarterly Review in 1883,
John W. Burgon, Dean of Chichester, used every rhetorical device at
his disposal to attack the Sinaiticus' earlier and opposing story of
Jesus Christ, saying that "...without a particle of hesitation, the
Sinaiticus is scandalously corrupt ... exhibiting the most
shamefully mutilated texts which are anywhere to be met with; they
have become, by whatever process, the depositories of the largest
amount of fabricated readings, ancient blunders and intentional
perversions of the truth which are discoverable in any known copies
of the word of God". Dean Burgon's concerns mirror opposing aspects
of Gospel stories then current, having by now evolved to a new stage
through centuries of tampering with the fabric of an already
unhistorical document.
The revelations of
ultraviolet light testing
In 1933, the British Museum in London
purchased the Sinai Bible from the Soviet government for £100,000,
of which £65,000 was gifted by public subscription. Prior to the
acquisition, this Bible was displayed in the Imperial Library in St
Petersburg, Russia, and "few scholars had set eyes on it" (The Daily
Telegraph and Morning Post, 11 January 1938, p. 3). When it went on
display in 1933 as "the oldest Bible in the world" (ibid.), it
became the centre of a pilgrimage unequalled in the history of the
British Museum. Before I summarise its conflictions, it should be
noted that this old codex is by no means a reliable guide to New
Testament study as it contains superabundant errors and serious
re-editing. These anomalies were exposed as a result of the months
of ultraviolet-light tests carried out at the British Museum in the
mid-1930s. The findings revealed replacements of numerous passages
by at least nine different editors. Photographs taken during testing
revealed that ink pigments had been retained deep in the pores of
the skin. The original words were readable under ultraviolet light.
Anybody wishing to read the results of the tests should refer to the
book written by the researchers who did the analysis: the Keepers of
the Department of Manuscripts at the British Museum (Scribes and
Correctors of the Codex Sinaiticus, H. J. M. Milne and T. C. Skeat,
British Museum, London, 1938).
Forgery in the Gospels
When the New Testament in the Sinai
Bible is compared with a modern-day New Testament, a staggering
14,800 editorial alterations can be identified. These amendments can
be recognised by a simple comparative exercise that anybody can and
should do. Serious study of Christian origins must emanate from the
Sinai Bible's version of the New Testament, not modern editions. Of
importance is the fact that the Sinaiticus carries three Gospels
since rejected: the Shepherd of Hermas (written by two resurrected
ghosts, Charinus and Lenthius), the Missive of Barnabas and the Odes
of Solomon. Space excludes elaboration on these bizarre writings and
also discussion on dilemmas associated with translation variations.
Modern Bibles are five removes in translation from early editions,
and disputes rage between translators over variant interpretations
of more than 5,000 ancient words. However, it is what is not written
in that old Bible that embarrasses the Church, and this article
discusses only a few of those omissions. One glaring example is
subtly revealed in the Encyclopaedia Biblica (Adam & Charles Black,
London, 1899, vol. iii, p. 3344), where the Church divulges its
knowledge about exclusions in old Bibles, saying: "The remark has
long ago and often been made that, like Paul, even the earliest
Gospels knew nothing of the miraculous birth of our Saviour". That
is because there never was a virgin birth. It is apparent that when
Eusebius assembled scribes to write the New Testimonies, he first
produced a single document that provided an exemplar or master
version. Today it is called the Gospel of Mark, and the Church
admits that it was "the first Gospel written" (Catholic Encyclopedia,
Farley ed., vol. vi, p. 657), even though it appears second in the
New Testament today. The scribes of the Gospels of Matthew and Luke
were dependent upon the Mark writing as the source and framework for
the compilation of their works. The Gospel of John is independent of
those writings, and the late-15th-century theory that it was written
later to support the earlier writings is the truth (The Crucifixion
of Truth, Tony Bushby, Joshua Books, 2004, pp. 33-40).
Thus, the Gospel of Mark in
the Sinai Bible carries the "first" story of Jesus Christ in
history, one completely different to what is in modern Bibles. It
starts with Jesus "at about the age of thirty" (Mark 1:9), and
doesn't know of Mary, a virgin birth or mass murders of baby boys by
Herod. Words describing Jesus Christ as "the son of God" do not
appear in the opening narrative as they do in today's editions (Mark
1:1), and the modern-day family tree tracing a "messianic bloodline"
back to King David is non-existent in all ancient Bibles, as are the
now-called "messianic prophecies" (51 in total). The Sinai Bible
carries a conflicting version of events surrounding the "raising of
Lazarus", and reveals an extraordinary omission that later became
the central doctrine of the Christian faith: the resurrection
appearances of Jesus Christ and his ascension into Heaven. No
supernatural appearance of a resurrected Jesus Christ is recorded in
any ancient Gospels of Mark, but a description of over 500 words now
appears in modern Bibles (Mark 16:9-20). Despite a multitude of
long-drawn-out self-justifications by Church apologists, there is no
unanimity of Christian opinion regarding the non-existence of
"resurrection" appearances in ancient Gospel accounts of the story.
Not only are those narratives missing in the Sinai Bible, but they
are absent in the Alexandrian Bible, the Vatican Bible, the Bezae
Bible and an ancient Latin manuscript of Mark, code-named "K" by
analysts. They are also lacking in the oldest Armenian version of
the New Testament, in sixth-century manuscripts of the Ethiopic
version and ninth-century Anglo-Saxon Bibles. However, some
12th-century Gospels have the now-known resurrection verses written
within asterisksÑmarks used by scribes to indicate spurious passages
in a literary document.
The Church claims that "the
resurrection is the fundamental argument for our Christian belief"
(Catholic Encyclopedia, Farley ed., vol. xii, p. 792), yet no
supernatural appearance of a resurrected Jesus Christ is recorded in
any of the earliest Gospels of Mark available. A resurrection and
ascension of Jesus Christ is the sine qua non ("without which,
nothing") of Christianity (Catholic Encyclopedia, Farley ed., vol.
xii, p. 792), confirmed by words attributed to Paul: "If Christ has
not been raised, your faith is in vain" (1 Cor. 5:17). The
resurrection verses in today's Gospels of Mark are universally
acknowledged as forgeries and the Church agrees, saying "the
conclusion of Mark is admittedly not genuine ... almost the entire
section is a later compilation" (Encyclopaedia Biblica, vol. ii, p.
1880, vol. iii, pp. 1767, 1781; also, Catholic Encyclopedia, vol.
iii, under the heading "The Evidence of its Spuriousness"; Catholic
Encyclopedia, Farley ed., vol. iii, pp. 274-9 under heading
"Canons"). Undaunted, however, the Church accepted the forgery into
its dogma and made it the basis of Christianity. The trend of
fictitious resurrection narratives continues. The final chapter of
the Gospel of John (21) is a sixth-century forgery, one entirely
devoted to describing Jesus' resurrection to his disciples. The
Church admits: "The sole conclusion that can be deduced from this is
that the 21st chapter was afterwards added and is therefore to be
regarded as an appendix to the Gospel" (Catholic Encyclopedia,
Farley ed., vol. viii, pp. 441-442; New Catholic Encyclopedia (NCE),
"Gospel of John", p. 1080; also NCE, vol. xii, p. 407).
"The Great Insertion" and
"The Great Omission"
Modern-day versions of the Gospel of
Luke have a staggering 10,000 more words than the same Gospel in the
Sinai Bible. Six of those words say of Jesus "and was carried up
into heaven", but this narrative does not appear in any of the
oldest Gospels of Luke available today ("Three Early Doctrinal
Modifications of the Text of the Gospels", F. C. Conybeare, The
Hibbert Journal, London, vol. 1, no. 1, Oct 1902, pp. 96-113).
Ancient versions do not verify modern-day accounts of an ascension
of Jesus Christ, and this falsification clearly indicates an
intention to deceive. Today, the Gospel of Luke is the longest of
the canonical Gospels because it now includes "The Great Insertion",
an extraordinary 15th-century addition totalling around 8,500 words
(Luke 9:51-18:14). The insertion of these forgeries into that Gospel
bewilders modern Christian analysts, and of them the Church said:
"The character of these passages makes it dangerous to draw
inferences" (Catholic Encyclopedia, Pecci ed., vol. ii, p. 407).
Just as remarkable, the oldest Gospels of Luke omit all verses from
6:45 to 8:26, known in priesthood circles as "The Great Omission", a
total of 1,547 words. In today's versions, that hole has been
"plugged up" with passages plagiarised from other Gospels. Dr
Tischendorf found that three paragraphs in newer versions of the
Gospel of Luke's version of the Last Supper appeared in the 15th
century, but the Church still passes its Gospels off as the
unadulterated "word of God" ("Are Our Gospels Genuine or Not?", op.
cit.)
The "Expurgatory Index"
As was the case with the New
Testament, so also were damaging writings of early "Church Fathers"
modified in centuries of copying, and many of their records were
intentionally rewritten or suppressed. Adopting the decrees of the
Council of Trent (1545-63), the Church subsequently extended the
process of erasure and ordered the preparation of a special list of
specific information to be expunged from early Christian writings
(Delineation of Roman Catholicism, Rev. Charles Elliott, DD, G. Lane
& P. P. Sandford, New York, 1842, p. 89; also, The Vatican Censors,
Professor Peter Elmsley, Oxford, p. 327, pub. date n/a). In 1562,
the Vatican established a special censoring office called Index
Expurgatorius. Its purpose was to prohibit publication of "erroneous
passages of the early Church Fathers" that carried statements
opposing modern-day doctrine. When Vatican archivists came across
"genuine copies of the Fathers, they corrected them according to the
Expurgatory Index" (Index Expurgatorius Vaticanus, R. Gibbings, ed.,
Dublin, 1837; The Literary Policy of the Church of Rome, Joseph
Mendham, J. Duncan, London, 1830, 2nd ed., 1840; The Vatican
Censors, op. cit., p. 328). This Church record provides researchers
with "grave doubts about the value of all patristic writings
released to the public" (The Propaganda Press of Rome, Sir James W.
L. Claxton, Whitehaven Books, London, 1942, p. 182). Important for
our story is the fact that the Encyclopaedia Biblica reveals that
around 1,200 years of Christian history are unknown: "Unfortunately,
only few of the records [of the Church] prior to the year 1198 have
been released". It was not by chance that, in that same year (1198),
Pope Innocent III (1198-1216) suppressed all records of earlier
Church history by establishing the Secret Archives (Catholic
Encyclopedia, Farley ed., vol. xv, p. 287). Some seven-and-a-half
centuries later, and after spending some years in those Archives,
Professor Edmond S. Bordeaux wrote How The Great Pan Died. In a
chapter titled "The Whole of Church History is Nothing but a
Retroactive Fabrication", he said this (in part): "The Church
ante-dated all her late works, some newly made, some revised and
some counterfeited, which contained the final expression of her
history ... her technique was to make it appear that much later
works written by Church writers were composed a long time earlier,
so that they might become evidence of the first, second or third
centuries."
(How The Great Pan Died, op.
cit., p. 46)
Supporting Professor
Bordeaux's findings is the fact that, in 1587, Pope Sixtus V
(1585-90) established an official Vatican publishing division and
said in his own words, "Church history will be now be established
... we shall seek to print our own account"Encyclopédie, Diderot,
1759). Vatican records also reveal that Sixtus V spent 18 months of
his life as pope personally writing a new Bible and then introduced
into Catholicism a "New Learning" (Catholic Encyclopedia, Farley
ed., vol. v, p. 442, vol. xv, p. 376). The evidence that the Church
wrote its own history is found in Diderot's Encyclopédie, and it
reveals the reason why Pope Clement XIII (1758-69) ordered all
volumes to be destroyed immediately after publication in 1759.
Gospel authors exposed as
imposters
There is something else involved in
this scenario and it is recorded in the Catholic Encyclopedia. An
appreciation of the clerical mindset arises when the Church itself
admits that it does not know who wrote its Gospels and Epistles,
confessing that all 27 New Testament writings began life
anonymously: "It thus appears that the present titles of the Gospels
are not traceable to the evangelists themselves ... they [the New
Testament collection] are supplied with titles which, however
ancient, do not go back to the respective authors of those
writings." (Catholic Encyclopedia, Farley ed., vol. vi, pp. 655-6)
The Church maintains that
"the titles of our Gospels were not intended to indicate
authorship", adding that "the headings ... were affixed to them"
(Catholic Encyclopedia, Farley ed., vol. i, p. 117, vol. vi, pp.
655, 656). Therefore they are not Gospels written "according to
Matthew, Mark, Luke or John", as publicly stated. The full force of
this confession reveals that there are no genuine apostolic Gospels,
and that the Church's shadowy writings today embody the very ground
and pillar of Christian foundations and faith. The consequences are
fatal to the pretence of Divine origin of the entire New Testament
and expose Christian texts as having no special authority. For
centuries, fabricated Gospels bore Church certification of
authenticity now confessed to be false, and this provides evidence
that Christian writings are wholly fallacious. After years of
dedicated New Testament research, Dr Tischendorf expressed dismay at
the differences between the oldest and newest Gospels, and had
trouble understanding... "...how scribes could allow themselves to
bring in here and there changes which were not simply verbal ones,
but such as materially affected the very meaning and, what is worse
still, did not shrink from cutting out a passage or inserting one."
(Alterations to the Sinai
Bible, Dr Constantin von Tischendorf, 1863, available in the British
Library, London)
After years of validating
the fabricated nature of the New Testament, a disillusioned Dr
Tischendorf confessed that modern-day editions have "been altered in
many places" and are "not to be accepted as true" (When Were Our
Gospels Written?, Dr Constantin von Tischendorf, 1865, British
Library, London).
Just what is
Christianity?
The important question then to ask is
this: if the New Testament is not historical, what is it? Dr
Tischendorf provided part of the answer when he said in his 15,000
pages of critical notes on the Sinai Bible that "it seems that the
personage of Jesus Christ was made narrator for many religions".
This explains how narratives from the ancient Indian epic, the
Mahabharata, appear verbatim in the Gospels today (e.g., Matt. 1:25,
2:11, 8:1-4, 9:1-8, 9:18-26), and why passages from the Phenomena of
the Greek statesman Aratus of Sicyon (271-213 BC) are in the New
Testament. Extracts from the Hymn to Zeus, written by Greek
philosopher Cleanthes (c. 331-232 BC), are also found in the
Gospels, as are 207 words from the Thais of Menander (c. 343-291),
one of the "seven wise men" of Greece. Quotes from the
semi-legendary Greek poet Epimenides (7th or 6th century BC) are
applied to the lips of Jesus Christ, and seven passages from the
curious Ode of Jupiter (c. 150 BC; author unknown) are reprinted in
the New Testament. Tischendorf's conclusion also supports Professor
Bordeaux's Vatican findings that reveal the allegory of Jesus Christ
derived from the fable of Mithra, the divine son of God (Ahura
Mazda) and messiah of the first kings of the Persian Empire around
400 BC. His birth in a grotto was attended by magi who followed a
star from the East. They brought "gifts of gold, frankincense and
myrrh" (as in Matt. 2:11) and the newborn baby was adored by
shepherds. He came into the world wearing the Mithraic cap, which
popes imitated in various designs until well into the 15th century.
Mithra, one of a trinity, stood on a rock, the emblem of the
foundation of his religion, and was anointed with honey. After a
last supper with Helios and 11 other companions, Mithra was
crucified on a cross, bound in linen, placed in a rock tomb and rose
on the third day or around 25 March (the full moon at the spring
equinox, a time now called Easter after the Babylonian goddess
Ishtar). The fiery destruction of the universe was a major doctrine
of Mithraism-a time in which Mithra promised to return in person to
Earth and save deserving souls. Devotees of Mithra partook in a
sacred communion banquet of bread and wine, a ceremony that
paralleled the Christian Eucharist and preceded it by more than four
centuries. Christianity is an adaptation of Mithraism welded with
the Druidic principles of the Culdees, some Egyptian elements (the
pre-Christian Book of Revelation was originally called The Mysteries
of Osiris and Isis), Greek philosophy and various aspects of
Hinduism.
Why there are no records
of Jesus Christ
It is not possible to find in any
legitimate religious or historical writings compiled between the
beginning of the first century and well into the fourth century any
reference to Jesus Christ and the spectacular events that the Church
says accompanied his life. This confirmation comes from Frederic
Farrar (1831-1903) of Trinity College, Cambridge: "It is amazing
that history has not embalmed for us even one certain or definite
saying or circumstance in the life of the Saviour of mankind ...
there is no statement in all history that says anyone saw Jesus or
talked with him. Nothing in history is more astonishing than the
silence of contemporary writers about events relayed in the four
Gospels."
(The Life of Christ,
Frederic W. Farrar, Cassell, London, 1874)
This situation arises from a
conflict between history and New Testament narratives. Dr
Tischendorf made this comment: "We must frankly admit that we have
no source of information with respect to the life of Jesus Christ
other than ecclesiastic writings assembled during the fourth
century."
(Codex Sinaiticus, Dr
Constantin von Tischendorf, British Library, London)
There is an explanation for
those hundreds of years of silence: the construct of Christianity
did not begin until after the first quarter of the fourth century,
and that is why Pope Leo X (d. 1521) called Christ a "fable"
(Cardinal Bembo: His Letters..., op. cit.).
About the Author:
Tony Bushby, an Australian, became a
businessman and entrepreneur early in his adult life. He established
a magazine-publishing business and spent 20 years researching,
writing and publishing his own magazines, primarily for the
Australian and New Zealand markets. With strong spiritual beliefs
and an interest in metaphysical subjects, Tony has developed long
relationships with many associations and societies throughout the
world that have assisted his research by making their archives
available. He is the author of The Bible Fraud (2001; reviewed in
NEXUS 8/06 with extracts in NEXUS 9/01—03), The Secret in the Bible
(2003; reviewed in 11/02, with extract, "Ancient Cities under the
Sands of Giza", in 11/03) and The Crucifixion of Truth (2005;
reviewed in 12/02) and The Twin Deception (2007; reviewed 14/03).
Copies of these books are available from the NEXUS website and the
Joshua Books website http://www.joshuabooks.com. As Tony Bushby
vigorously protects his privacy, any correspondence should be sent
to him care of NEXUS Magazine, PO Box 30, Mapleton Qld 4560,
Australia, fax +61 (0) 7 5442 9381.
See also:
Shock Secret Identity of Israel's Yahweh
Revealed! |